Best balancing solution for supercapacitors

Design teams are now eyeing supercapacitors for a range of new products in energy harvesting, office automation, backup systems, and more. These supercapacitor cells provide efficient storage that can quickly discharge energy on demand. To ensure peak performance and a long product life cycle, the supercapacitor’s voltage must be balanced. If an imbalance occurs due to leakage current differences between the cells, an energy drain could be triggered, causing the supercapacitor cells to fail prematurely.

Supercapacitors, also known as ultracapacitors, provide high power, rapid charging and discharging, peak-power shaving, and backup power functions for mission-critical data-protection and battery-backup applications. They are becoming a popular choice for applications in which the need for power doesn’t exceed 30 seconds.

Supercapacitors are also raising the bar on energy density. As the cells gradually increase power density, they can buffer and store energy more effectively — thus maximizing energy-gathering efforts.

Here’s the rub: Each supercapacitor has a tolerance difference in capacitance, internal resistance, and leakage current. This may create an imbalance in cell voltage. The balanced of them must ensure that the voltage doesn’t exceed the maximum voltage rating.

Power system designers should select supercapacitors from the same manufacturer to make sure that the initial cell voltage values fall into a similar range. Second, there must be compensation for any cell voltage imbalance caused by leakage current in individual cells.

There are two types of balancing methods used to regulate voltage in supercapacitor cells: active and passive. A low-value resistor is used in a passive balancing method. This method dissipates power and doesn’t respond to the temperature variations. Active balancing techniques are achieved with operational amplifiers (op-amps) or current balancing using MOSFETs.

Below are two scenarios with supercapacitors stacked in a series. The first scenario presents once´s with auto-balancing, and the second presents others without auto-balancing. The differences between these two design scenarios will demonstrate the need for a balancing method that automatically corrects the effects of changing leakage currents.

Supercapacitors without auto-balancing

Leakage current can cause voltage imbalance and power dissipation. Power system designers must compensate for the leakage current from each individual supercapacitor cell. Otherwise, the operating life can be reduced or even permanently damaged if the excess voltage surpasses the rated voltage of a cell for a prolonged time period.

The below illustration (Fig. 1) presents two supercapacitors connected in series without the aid of an auto-balancing mechanism. It depicts how the leakage current moves up and down with differential voltage. If not balanced, this issue can cause failure due to overvoltage effects.

Fig. 1: A view of two supercapacitors connected in series without an auto-balancing mechanism.

Fig. 1 illustrates that at 2.3 V, the upper supercapacitor has a leakage current of 1.6 µA, while the lower exhibits leakage current of 0.8 µA. If these two don’t balance and equalize the leakage current, the lower´s one can permanently fail due to the excessive voltage.

Supercapacitors with auto-balancing

Fig. 2 illustrates how MOSFETS balance supercapacitors by lowering the operating bias voltage of the supercapacitor, thus balancing the circuit’s power burn.

Fig. 2: Two supercapacitors connected in series accomplish superior auto-balancing using a MOSFET chip.

Supercapacitors without auto-balancing, denoted by the dotted horizontal line above, can subsequently damage cells due to overvoltage. The solid horizontal line marks the current balancing operation using a MOSFET device. When a MOSFET is connected across a supercapacitor in an array, a small rise in voltage caused by leakage current from another supercapacitor leads to a larger decline in on-resistance (RDS(ON)) of that MOSFET. This causes a hike in the supercapacitor’s current, subsequently reducing the voltage.

The principle of auto-balancing uses the natural threshold characteristics of the MOSFET device. At the threshold voltage, the MOSFET turns on and starts to conduct a current. That feature ensures that there is little or no additional leakage current from the MOSFET chip.

Fig. 2 also shows how the op-amp voltage-balancing method forces the two supercapacitor cells to reach the same voltage at the mid-point of 2.3 V. However, in doing so, the two cells consume some power. If the capacitance of the two cells is not adequately balanced, that causes additional power burn. Consequently, there is a significant waste of energy during the process of automated balancing with the op-amps. In addition, op-amps dissipate power themselves through their circuit networks.

Unlike op-amps, which can cause a power penalty if there is a mismatch between the capacitance values of two cells, MOSFETs enable natural cell balancing through complementary opposing current levels.

In addition, supercapacitor cell 1 and cell 2 in Fig. 2 are interchangeable. Therefore, it is unknown which one has more leakage current. Some of the currents comes from the MOSFET itself.

The MOSFET-based leakage current balancing mechanism is fully automated, and it works with nearly all supercapacitors. This auto-balancing technique requires no additional current drain, and it can automatically adjust to the temperature, time, and environmental changes.

Fig. 3 on left: A block diagram of a SABMB2 board, measuring 0.6 × 1 inch, for supercapacitor automatic balancing.

From MOSFET to board

Plug-and-play printed circuit boards (PCBs) can be populated with MOSFETS that automatically balance leakage current and voltage of supercapacitor cells. A single MOSFET or multiple MOSFETs can be mounted on the supercapacitor automatic balancing (SAB) PCBs to automatically balance the cells.

As an example, ALD’s plug-and-play SAB PCBs can be used for prototyping or production designs. These boards can be cascaded to form a series chain, ranging from two to hundreds for balancing supercapacitor stacks.

Source: Electronic Products news

By Robert Chao, president and founder, Advanced Linear Devices, Inc. MOSFETs lower the operating bias voltage of the supercapacitor, balancing the circuit’s power burn, and can automatically adjust to the temperature, time, and environmental changes.